Comments on: Publisher Perpetual Access Information wiki update http://electroniclibrarian.org/forum/2007/10/05/publisher-perpetual-access-information-wiki-update/ Thu, 17 May 2012 18:14:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: kelly smith http://electroniclibrarian.org/forum/2007/10/05/publisher-perpetual-access-information-wiki-update/#comment-7158 kelly smith Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:50:31 +0000 http://electroniclibrarian.org/forum/2007/10/05/publisher-perpetual-access-information-wiki-update/#comment-7158 This was EBSCO's response when we asked them if they minded that we had posted the notes: "We collect this information for our customer's use. We have a department working on gathering this type of information and feel that it's ours for use by authorized EBSCONET customers. We hope you won't mind removing the EBSCONET notes from the spreadsheet." I asked Laura to go ahead and remove the notes from the spreadsheet. IMO, there's no need to create animosity with our subscription agent. I could certainly see where copyright might be an issue for this, which is why we checked it out with them in the first place. This was EBSCO’s response when we asked them if they minded that we had posted the notes:
“We collect this information for our customer’s use. We have a department
working on gathering this type of information and feel that it’s ours for
use by authorized EBSCONET customers. We hope you won’t mind removing the
EBSCONET notes from the spreadsheet.”

I asked Laura to go ahead and remove the notes from the spreadsheet. IMO, there’s no need to create animosity with our subscription agent. I could certainly see where copyright might be an issue for this, which is why we checked it out with them in the first place.

]]> By: Brenda Braham http://electroniclibrarian.org/forum/2007/10/05/publisher-perpetual-access-information-wiki-update/#comment-7090 Brenda Braham Thu, 11 Oct 2007 20:56:07 +0000 http://electroniclibrarian.org/forum/2007/10/05/publisher-perpetual-access-information-wiki-update/#comment-7090 And why did you comply with their request? Is there some proprietary information that they didn't want out in the public? I don't understand why it would be removed just because they asked. And why did you comply with their request? Is there some proprietary information that they didn’t want out in the public? I don’t understand why it would be removed just because they asked.

]]> By: charlener http://electroniclibrarian.org/forum/2007/10/05/publisher-perpetual-access-information-wiki-update/#comment-6842 charlener Tue, 09 Oct 2007 01:43:12 +0000 http://electroniclibrarian.org/forum/2007/10/05/publisher-perpetual-access-information-wiki-update/#comment-6842 It is blank no more - sometimes putting in hard returns/newlines/cr's in individual cells confuses the spreadsheet mightily. It's been rolled back to the oct 5 version sans ebsco - and I'm still interested as to why it was removed, too. It is blank no more - sometimes putting in hard returns/newlines/cr’s in individual cells confuses the spreadsheet mightily. It’s been rolled back to the oct 5 version sans ebsco - and I’m still interested as to why it was removed, too.

]]> By: Jonathan http://electroniclibrarian.org/forum/2007/10/05/publisher-perpetual-access-information-wiki-update/#comment-6824 Jonathan Mon, 08 Oct 2007 21:01:43 +0000 http://electroniclibrarian.org/forum/2007/10/05/publisher-perpetual-access-information-wiki-update/#comment-6824 Thanks, but the wiki's now blank! Thanks, but the wiki’s now blank!

]]> By: Patricia Thompson http://electroniclibrarian.org/forum/2007/10/05/publisher-perpetual-access-information-wiki-update/#comment-6695 Patricia Thompson Sun, 07 Oct 2007 14:58:31 +0000 http://electroniclibrarian.org/forum/2007/10/05/publisher-perpetual-access-information-wiki-update/#comment-6695 Why? Why?

]]>