Archive for November, 2006

Archiving Digital Data an Unsolved Problem

Charlene Barina November 20th, 2006

A posting on Slashdot (geek central, for those of you unaware) concerning what will happen to digital files someday and whether future generations will be able to access them…the US National Archivist is quoted in it.

I read a similar bit a while back proposing that archeologists will eventually be supplanted by anthropologists who will sift through digital detritus and random spam emails in order to learn about those vanished civilations. Based on that trail, they’ll all think this era was obsessed with hair regrowth and penny stocks!

Digital reading software - useful or superfluous?

Charlene Barina November 20th, 2006

Not much info here, but here are links to discussions relating to Adobe Digital Editions and the Times Reader. Looks like slightly more intuitive/reflowing text, but both require a download and update to .NET to some beta version, which I wasn’t willing to wait for.

OpenURL and students’ need-to-know

Charlene Barina November 20th, 2006

As a graduate student, I’ve come to appreciate more the varieties of ways to leverage things like journal article access and what we have here at UW. However, sometimes it’s a question of guess and find out, too.

I use connotea, a Nature-based cross between social bookmarking and endnote, that allows me to bookmark articles and tag them with topics and what-not (see my listings for some real-life examples). The developers of connotea are using working on plugins to auto-import citation information, and user contributions help a lot in expanding their options (right now, it’ll auto-recognized from PubMed, but not from, say, Jstor or Taylor and Francis).

The kicker though is that there is an option for entering a OpenURL resolver for your institution so that it’ll generate OpenURL links for each item you add to your list. This has proven pretty useful for browsing journals or jumping to my pdfs, but it was information that wasn’t readily accessible. I think my email request for the server literally was forwarded on to the Associate Dean of Libraries for the libraries on-campus - which definitely made me feel spiffy on one level - like getting a response from the President of the University concerning directions to his office.

Similarly, while playing around with modifying existing libx code for UW catalogs, I ended up getting an email from the head of information systems for UW libraries - also fairly neat. I got libx to work with UW and Seattle Public Libraries’ catalog (I just randomly plugged in OPAC options for them), but javascript did me in and I haven’t worked on it since.

I’m still vague on what OpenURL and OPACs are, really, but using some IT finagling, where you rarely knowwhat the heck you’re doing anyway worked well enough :)

I guess my main question is there a reason that the library infrastructure isn’t accessible through faq/site searching? Or is this something that varies from library to library? With random library and info widgets floating around out there, are libraries even interested in open-sourced or enduser-built access products?

Web 2.0

ksmith November 13th, 2006

I was reading a recent issue of “Library Technology Reports” about the Web 2.0 concept. This may be old news to a lot of you, but I suspect it is new to those of us who are less “techy”. In brief, it’s the idea that the content of websites are dynamic and should be a collaboration between their creators and their users, not just static libraries of information. Blogs and wikis are two examples of Web 2.0 software. You can read more about it here:

http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html

http://www.techsource.ala.org/blog/2005/09/web-20-for-librarians.html