Elizabeth Winter February 11th, 2009
Below is a summary of the discussion at today’s Lightning Talks. Please let me know if you have any corrections or additions to this discussion: elizabeth.winter@library.gatech.edu Also, feel free to comment below. Thanks! -Elizabeth
Steven Harris–University of New Mexico:
Asked how we can get people across the library to collaborate and share information
- Mark Anderson—Univ. of Iowa mentioned that a discrete project would help.
- Elizabeth Winter–Georgia Tech mentioned GT’s EPIC (Electronic Products Integration Committee), an interdepartmental group that discusses and makes decisions about various technology projects in the library. This group meets monthly with a relatively formal agenda, but anyone on the committee can submit agenda items and bring up ideas and projects for discussion. Most departments in the library are represented on this committee, and the group has a liaison to administration.
Margaret Hogarth—UC Riverside
Last year’s roundtable on usage statistics—out of that has come a Publisher’s usage statistics report on the ER&L wiki. We’re collaborating to compile a list of publishers and what sort of usage statistics they provide; also to gather best practices for gathering usage stats.
http://Electroniclibrarian.org/erlwiki/Usage_Stats_Home Please help us build this document!
Andrea Imre—Southern Illinois Univ. Carbondale
Thinking about articles published using the author-paid model, but because we track content at the journal level, we aren’t necessarily making that content available to our users. She is considering creating a database of freely available articles across publishers. Publishers so far aren’t very forthcoming with data about these articles. Please contact Andrea if you want to work together on this: aimre@lib.siu.edu
Steven Harris suggested perhaps finding a way to crawl the publisher’s sites to find this. Might we be able to use OAI-PMH protocol? Is CrossRef doing anything that could help us to identify these articles?
Tim Cherubini—SOLINET
Wants to know: What makes you glad about your consortium memberships?
What makes you unhappy about your consortium memberships?
What are they not doing that you’d like to see them do?
- Posie Aagaard–UT San Antonio: (UT System consortium) Happy with system will negotiate licenses and share titles; frustrated with working with huge spreadsheets and not sharing information as well as they could; hard to know which titles others are adding and dropping from packages as you make your decisions.
Rick Burke—SCELC: Do people feel that mega-consortia mergers are good for the library world.
- Andrea Imre—SIU: Merger experience within Illinois was good b/c it eliminated some of the bureaucracy—don’t have to worry about which consortium to deal with—it’s all one now.
- John Dobbins—Occidental College: Good things: Getting together in manageable groups, sharing information and learning from each other to avoid duplicating effort
- Steven Harris—UNM: role of the various OCLC regional providers…seem to function as consortia.
John Dobbins—Occidental College:
Moving to pay-per-view (PPV) for Elsevier. Is anyone else doing this? What research have others done on cost-per-article and what have you found out?
- Katie Fearer—Alaska State Library: PPV through Elsevier. Make decisions in part on what is paid to CCC and when fees approach subscription price.
- Bruce Esrig—OCLC: How do users find the things they want to access from PPV?
- Jill Emery—University of Texas: all titles in SFX so that people could discover them, but not much uptake.
- Someone else is considering doing PPV but not in catalog and link resolver—people are coming from Google, just make sure they know that the library will have to pay if they download the article.
Katie Fearer—Alaska State Library
How do people decide what to cancel in print?
- Dana Walker—UGA; Cancelling everything; process is to use price and usage statistics and putting this info. out for subject specialists to consider.
- Jill Emery—UT Austin: When they get a report of format from subs agent about things becoming available online, they forward to the subject specialists who have to justify why they want to keep print; mark as an intentional duplicate
- Someone mentioned that their library was going through a big cancellation project; getting rid of a lot of standing orders, mark to review if/when to order on a yearly basis.
- Margaret Hogarth—UC Riverside: currently quick and dirty cancellation, but when they have more time, look at serial price increases. If the title went up a certain % in a year, that was one criterion for review. Looked at titles based on package, etc.
Someone (Sorry–I couldn’t see who it was)
What to do with journals that arrive on a flash drive, PDF, email, Word docs, etc.?
- Angela Hand –Univ. of Arkansas: created an e-resource file on the local network to keep these. Can’t really do anything with them now but are saving them until they figure out what to do with them. Also print out a preservation archival copy for archivists.
- Andrea Imre—SIU: Need to let publishers know that that’s unacceptable and cancel subscriptions if publishers move to this format
- Someone suggested that Greenstone out of New Zealand sounds like a good option for archiving digital information.
- Jill Emery suggested ArchiveIt out of San Francisco: UT is using this to archive South American web sites (screen scrapes) because these are often ephemeral.
Thanks for your participation in the Lightning Talks. Feel free to comment below and continue the discussion here on the ER&L Forum blog.